
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 81W instead of 160W, a 79W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,707 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+159.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌97.5% higher power demand at 160W vs 81W.
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
2014GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 81W instead of 160W, a 79W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+159.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,707 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌97.5% higher power demand at 160W vs 81W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 59 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 783 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 196 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 196 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE and GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE scores 6,707 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU's 17,400 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 159.4%. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,707 | 17,400+159% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 4352+240% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.657 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+730% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 2535 MHz+144% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 80 | 136+70% |
| L1 Cache | 0.47 MB | 4.3 MB+815% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB+2033% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 120 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) — a 113.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 120 GB/s | 256 GB/s+113% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB+2033% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE draws 81W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU's 160W — a 65.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 81W-49% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 82.8 | 108.8+31% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












