G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,707 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+60.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

2014

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅+60.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,707 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 6,707 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is a 2014 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2014, 60.3% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $169 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 60.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
1080p
low	100 FPS	85 FPS
medium	85 FPS	72 FPS
high	68 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	74 FPS
medium	75 FPS	64 FPS
high	54 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	30 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	27 FPS
medium	26 FPS	25 FPS
high	17 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
1080p
low	156 FPS	174 FPS
medium	127 FPS	149 FPS
high	102 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	87 FPS
1440p
low	108 FPS	129 FPS
medium	82 FPS	106 FPS
high	65 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	74 FPS
medium	38 FPS	62 FPS
high	35 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	34 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
1080p
low	302 FPS	484 FPS
medium	241 FPS	387 FPS
high	201 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	151 FPS	242 FPS
1440p
low	226 FPS	363 FPS
medium	181 FPS	290 FPS
high	151 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	181 FPS
4K
low	151 FPS	242 FPS
medium	121 FPS	193 FPS
high	89 FPS	161 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	121 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
1080p
low	135 FPS	243 FPS
medium	110 FPS	210 FPS
high	95 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	98 FPS	185 FPS
medium	81 FPS	166 FPS
high	70 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	109 FPS
4K
low	59 FPS	104 FPS
medium	45 FPS	87 FPS
high	35 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	55 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE scores 6,707 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 60.3%. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1470 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score	6,707	10,749+60%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1280	2304+80%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.657 TFLOPS	6.774 TFLOPS+155%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1470 MHz+42%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	80+11%	72
L1 Cache	0.47 MB	2.3 MB+389%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 120 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 40% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Bus width: 192-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	120 GB/s	168 GB/s+40%
Bus Width	192-bit+100%	96-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder	5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)	NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder	1st Gen NVDEC	NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE draws 81W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 14.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.