
GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 960: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 960 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 960
2015Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 960: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 960 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 960 better than Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS make more sense than GeForce GTX 960?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133+2% | 6,000 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1536+50% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1250 MHz+6% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 960 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 960 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 960 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) vs 135 GB/s (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) — a 20.5% advantage for the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 135 GB/s+21% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 30W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3 | 200.0+226% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS launched at $0. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS costs 100+% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM206 | — |
| Release | January 22 2015 | October 26 2023 |
| Ranking | #393 | #459 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













