
GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,133 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+130.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 31.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 960
2015GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+130.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 31.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,133 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than GeForce GTX 960?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 960 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 635 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 159 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 119 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 130.1%. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133 | 14,114+130% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1920+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+167% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1680 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 120+88% |
| L1 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1.9 MB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 960 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 960 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 336 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 960) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 960 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 C vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-38% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | 72-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3 | 88.2+44% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. The GeForce GTX 960 costs 43% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 31.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-43% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.8 | 40.4+31% |
| Codename | GM206 | TU106 |
| Release | January 22 2015 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #393 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













