
GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,133 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+64.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 31.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 960
2015GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+64.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 31.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,133 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than GeForce GTX 960?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 960 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 64.1%. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133 | 10,064+64% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2560+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+268% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1733 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 160+150% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 960 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 960 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 192 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 960) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 57.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 960 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-44% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 400W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3+10% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. The GeForce GTX 960 costs 20.1% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 31.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-20% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.8 | 40.4+31% |
| Codename | GM206 | GP104 |
| Release | January 22 2015 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #393 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













