GeForce GTX 750 vs Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K5100M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

3312

G3D Mark Score

3264

Performance Difference

GeForce GTX 750 is 1.5% faster than Quadro K5100M

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce GTX 7502048 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
9%
low37%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 3,312 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Quadro K5100M8192 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
31%
low70%
medium44%
high27%
ultra17%
1440pLow
19%
low44%
medium27%
high17%
ultra10%
4KLimited
11%
low27%
medium17%
high10%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

8 GB VRAM Β· 3,264 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Balanced mode: +40-50% FPS. Helps at 1440p/4K.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GeForce GTX 750 performs 1.5% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce GTX 750 and Quadro K5100M.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce GTX 750 and Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750

The GeForce GTX 750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,312 points. Launch price was $119.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:2048 MB
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:1020 MHz
Boost Clock:1085 MHz
Shading Units:512
Max Temperature:95 Β°C
Transistor Count:1,870 million
Texture Fill Rate:34.72
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):55 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.111 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM107
Architecture:Maxwell (2014βˆ’2017)
Launch Price:$119
Release Date:February 18 2014
Performance Ranking Position:559
NVIDIA

Quadro K5100M

The Quadro K5100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,264 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:128
Vram:8192 MB
L1 Cache:128 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:771 MHz
Shading Units:1536
Transistor Count:3,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:98.69
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):100 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.369 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK104
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Release Date:July 23 2013
Performance Ranking Position:562

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 750 and Quadro K5100M