GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M270X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 295

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M270X

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

1198

G3D Mark Score

1204

Performance Difference

Radeon R9 M270X is 0.5% faster than GeForce GTX 295

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce GTX 2951792 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
5%
low5%
medium5%
high5%
ultra5%
1440pLimited
5%
low5%
medium5%
high5%
ultra5%
4KLimited
5%
low5%
medium5%
high5%
ultra5%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 1,198 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon R9 M270X4096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
8%
low27%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
5%
low10%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 1,204 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon R9 M270X performs 0.5% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M270X.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M270X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 295

The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 576 MHz. It has 480 Γ—2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:28 Γ—2
TMUs:80 Γ—2
Vram:1792 MB
L2 Cache:224 kB
Core Clock:576 MHz
Shading Units:480 Γ—2
Max Temperature:105 Β°C
Transistor Count:1,400 million
Texture Fill Rate:46.08 Γ—2
Manufacturing Process:55 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):289 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.5962 TFLOPS Γ—2
NΓΊMero De Transportadores CUDA Por Placa De VΓ­Deo:240

General Information

Codename:GT200B
Architecture:Tesla 2.0 (2007βˆ’2013)
Launch Price:$500
Release Date:January 8 2009
Performance Ranking Position:816
AMD

Radeon R9 M270X

The Radeon R9 M270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,204 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:40
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:160 kB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Core Clock:725 MHz
Boost Clock:775 MHz
Shading Units:640
Transistor Count:1,500 million
Texture Fill Rate:31.00
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Floating Point Performance:0.992 TFLOPS
Quantidade De Transportadores Compute:10

General Information

Codename:Venus
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Release Date:March 21 2014
Performance Ranking Position:819

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M270X