
FX-6120
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
FX-6120
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($188 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,853 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($188 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +234.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 333.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $188 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌5.9% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$188 MSRP
FX-6120
2012Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($188 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +234.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 333.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $188 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,853 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($188 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌5.9% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$188 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than FX-6120?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 242 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 357 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-6120 and Ryzen 5 3600

FX-6120
FX-6120
The FX-6120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,853 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The FX-6120 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Ryzen 5 3600's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-6120 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The FX-6120 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6120 scores 3,853 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 128.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6120 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 3,853 | 17,685+359% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,295 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-6120 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-6120) / Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
The FX-6120 launched at $188 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($188 vs $199), the FX-6120 is $11 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-6120 delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 125% better value option.
| Feature | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $188-6% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.5 | 88.9+334% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












