FirePro W7000 Adapter vs Tesla K40c

FirePro W7000 Adapter

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K40c

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

4383

G3D Mark Score

4495

Performance Difference

Tesla K40c is 2.6% faster than FirePro W7000 Adapter

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

FirePro W7000 AdapterN/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
Tesla K40cN/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Tesla K40c performs 2.6% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between FirePro W7000 Adapter and Tesla K40c.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for FirePro W7000 Adapter and Tesla K40c

FirePro W7000 Adapter

The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Core clock: 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:null
L1 Cache:320 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:950 MHz
Shading Units:1280
Transistor Count:2,800 million
Texture Fill Rate:76.00
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):350 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.432 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Pitcairn
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$899
Release Date:June 13 2012
Performance Ranking Position:477
NVIDIA

Tesla K40c

The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:48
TMUs:240
Vram:null
L1 Cache:240 kB
L2 Cache:1536 kB
Core Clock:745 MHz
Boost Clock:876 MHz
Shading Units:2880
Transistor Count:7,080 million
Texture Fill Rate:210.2
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):245 Watt
Floating Point Performance:5.046 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK180
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$7,699
Release Date:October 8 2013
Performance Ranking Position:465

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W7000 Adapter and Tesla K40c