FirePro W4300 vs Quadro K5000M

FirePro W4300

Quadro K5000M

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro W4300

2,719

0.0%

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

2,805

+3.2%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

2719

G3D Mark Score

2805

Performance Difference

Quadro K5000M is 3.2% faster than FirePro W4300

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

FirePro W43004096 MB

016GB32GB

1080pLow

10%

low47%

medium10%

high4%

ultra4%

1440pLimited

low20%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

4KLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

📊 Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM · 2,719 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.

1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Quadro K5000M4096 MB

016GB32GB

1080pLow

10%

low47%

medium10%

high4%

ultra4%

1440pLimited

low20%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

4KLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

📊 Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM · 2,805 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.

1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro K5000M performs 3.2% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5000M.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5000M

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16

TMUs:48

Vram:4096 MB

L1 Cache:192 kB

L2 Cache:256 kB

Core Clock:930 MHz

Shading Units:768

Transistor Count:2,080 million

Texture Fill Rate:44.64

Manufacturing Process:28 nm

Power Consumption (TDP):50 Watt

Floating Point Performance:1.428 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Bonaire

Architecture:GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)

Release Date:December 1 2015

Performance Ranking Position:590

Quadro K5000M

The Quadro K5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 601 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $329.99.