FirePro V8700 vs Quadro K2000

FirePro V8700

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K2000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

1539

G3D Mark Score

1582

Performance Difference

Quadro K2000 is 2.8% faster than FirePro V8700

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

FirePro V8700N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
Quadro K20002048 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 1,582 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro K2000 performs 2.8% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between FirePro V8700 and Quadro K2000.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for FirePro V8700 and Quadro K2000

FirePro V8700

The FirePro V8700 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. Core clock: 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,539 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:null
L1 Cache:320 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:725 MHz
Shading Units:1280
Transistor Count:2,640 million
Texture Fill Rate:58.00
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):151 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.856 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Cayman
Architecture:TeraScale 3 (2010βˆ’2013)
Release Date:May 24 2011
Performance Ranking Position:656
NVIDIA

Quadro K2000

The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:2048 MB
L1 Cache:32 kB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Core Clock:954 MHz
Shading Units:384
Transistor Count:1,270 million
Texture Fill Rate:30.53
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):51 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.7327 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK107
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$599
Release Date:March 1 2013
Performance Ranking Position:756

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro V8700 and Quadro K2000