FirePro M6100 vs GRID K240Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

2495

G3D Mark Score

2541

Performance Difference

GRID K240Q is 1.8% faster than FirePro M6100

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

FirePro M61002048 MB

016GB32GB

1080pLimited

low24%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

1440pLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

4KLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

📊 Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM · 2,495 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.

1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

GRID K240QN/A

016GB32GB

VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GRID K240Q performs 1.8% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between FirePro M6100 and GRID K240Q.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for FirePro M6100 and GRID K240Q

FirePro M6100

The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16

TMUs:56

Vram:2048 MB

L1 Cache:224 kB

L2 Cache:256 kB

Core Clock:1100 MHz

Shading Units:896

Transistor Count:2,080 million

Texture Fill Rate:61.60

Manufacturing Process:28 nm

Floating Point Performance:1.971 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Emerald

Architecture:GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)

Release Date:May 27 2014

Performance Ranking Position:638

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.