
EPYC 9845
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9845
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 160 cores / 320 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($13,564 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌500% higher power demand at 390W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $13,265 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 547.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 390W, a 325W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9845 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 152,985).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9845, which brings 160 cores / 320 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9845 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9845
2024Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 160 cores / 320 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $13,265 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 547.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 390W, a 325W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($13,564 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌500% higher power demand at 390W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9845 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 152,985).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9845, which brings 160 cores / 320 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9845 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9845 better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 743 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 481 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 958 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 869 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 746 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 646 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 739 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 552 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9845 and Ryzen 5 5600X

EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845
The EPYC 9845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 160 cores and 320 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 390 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 152,985 points. Launch price was $13,564.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9845 packs 160 cores / 320 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9845 has 154 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9845 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 9845 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9845 scores 152,985 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 150% lead for the EPYC 9845. L3 cache: 320 MB (total) on the EPYC 9845 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 160 / 320+2567% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz+76% |
| L3 Cache | 320 MB (total)+900% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 152,985+600% | 21,845 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9845 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9845 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the EPYC 9845 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9845) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9845) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the EPYC 9845 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9845) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9845) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: EPYC 9845 targets Data Center / AI Training, Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 9845 rivals Xeon 6972P.
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Data Center / AI Training | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9845 launched at $13564 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($13564 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $13265 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9845 delivers 11.3 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 146.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $13564 | $299-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3 | 73.1+547% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











