PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9845

2024

Why buy it

✅+14.9% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($13,564 MSRP vs $7,349 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.1% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $6,215 less on MSRP ($7,349 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
✅Delivers 60.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($7,349 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (133,149 vs 152,985).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 320 MB).

EPYC 9845

2024

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

2023

Why buy it

✅+14.9% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.1% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $6,215 less on MSRP ($7,349 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
✅Delivers 60.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($7,349 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($13,564 MSRP vs $7,349 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (133,149 vs 152,985).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 320 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9845 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is ahead with a 40.1% average FPS lead across 11 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9845 pulls ahead with 14.9% better PassMark. EPYC 9845 also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9845 is the better fit. You are getting 14.9% better PassMark, backed by 160 cores and 320 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9845 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9845 is 84.6% more expensive on MSRP at $13,564 MSRP versus $7,349 MSRP, and it gives you 14.9% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 40.1% average FPS lead across 11 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is also 60.6% better value on MSRP (18.1 vs 11.3 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9845 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 160 cores / 320 threads instead of 64/128. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9845 Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9845	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
1080p
low	192 FPS	302 FPS
medium	156 FPS	279 FPS
high	126 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	195 FPS
1440p
low	158 FPS	268 FPS
medium	124 FPS	223 FPS
high	96 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	152 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	185 FPS
medium	60 FPS	154 FPS
high	47 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	104 FPS

Open EPYC 9845 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9845	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
1080p
low	274 FPS	787 FPS
medium	241 FPS	672 FPS
high	198 FPS	529 FPS
ultra	163 FPS	462 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	649 FPS
medium	202 FPS	577 FPS
high	171 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	380 FPS
4K
low	139 FPS	363 FPS
medium	128 FPS	327 FPS
high	115 FPS	302 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	265 FPS

Open EPYC 9845 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9845	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
1080p
low	743 FPS	889 FPS
medium	610 FPS	728 FPS
high	556 FPS	654 FPS
ultra	481 FPS	556 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	693 FPS
medium	494 FPS	567 FPS
high	450 FPS	498 FPS
ultra	390 FPS	419 FPS
4K
low	430 FPS	490 FPS
medium	335 FPS	407 FPS
high	298 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	303 FPS

Open EPYC 9845 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9845	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
1080p
low	958 FPS	1131 FPS
medium	869 FPS	1014 FPS
high	746 FPS	889 FPS
ultra	646 FPS	802 FPS
1440p
low	739 FPS	890 FPS
medium	646 FPS	783 FPS
high	552 FPS	688 FPS
ultra	473 FPS	599 FPS
4K
low	530 FPS	649 FPS
medium	474 FPS	579 FPS
high	415 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9845 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9845 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 9845

The EPYC 9845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 160 cores and 320 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 390 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 152,985 points. Launch price was $13,564.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 133,149 points. Launch price was $7,349.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9845 packs 160 cores / 320 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9845 has 96 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9845 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9845 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9845 scores 152,985 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX's 133,149 — a 13.9% lead for the EPYC 9845. L3 cache: 320 MB (total) on the EPYC 9845 vs 256 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX.

Feature	EPYC 9845	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Cores / Threads	160 / 320+150%	64 / 128
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	5.1 GHz+38%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache	320 MB (total)+25%	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm-40%	5 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Storm Peak (2023)
PassMark	152,985+15%	133,149
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	100,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,599
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	24,780

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9845 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9845) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9845) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX).

Feature	EPYC 9845	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Socket	SP5	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+200%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9845) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9845 targets Data Center / AI Training, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9845 rivals Xeon 6972P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX rivals Xeon w9-3475X.

Feature	EPYC 9845	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Data Center / AI Training	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9845 launched at $13564 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX debuted at $7349. On MSRP ($13564 vs $7349), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is $6215 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9845 delivers 11.3 pts/$ vs 18.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX the 46.5% better value option.