PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9555P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,822 less on MSRP ($7,983 MSRP vs $11,805 MSRP).
✅Delivers 68.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $11,805 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).

EPYC 9654

2022

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9555P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (20,000 vs 29,406).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($11,805 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).

EPYC 9555P

2024

EPYC 9654

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,822 less on MSRP ($7,983 MSRP vs $11,805 MSRP).
✅Delivers 68.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $11,805 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9555P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (20,000 vs 29,406).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($11,805 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9555P better than EPYC 9654?

Yes. EPYC 9555P is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 47% better Geekbench multi-core, 13.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9555P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9555P is the better fit. You are getting 47% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9555P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9555P is $3,822 cheaper on MSRP at $7,983 MSRP versus $11,805 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 68.0% better value on MSRP (17.0 vs 10.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9555P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 96/192. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9555P Benchmark Check

EPYC 9654 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9555P	EPYC 9654
1080p
low	171 FPS	170 FPS
medium	142 FPS	141 FPS
high	122 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	148 FPS
medium	121 FPS	119 FPS
high	99 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	70 FPS
medium	73 FPS	59 FPS
high	57 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 9555P Open EPYC 9654

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9555P	EPYC 9654
1080p
low	655 FPS	524 FPS
medium	566 FPS	457 FPS
high	459 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	397 FPS	296 FPS
1440p
low	546 FPS	431 FPS
medium	483 FPS	385 FPS
high	404 FPS	317 FPS
ultra	328 FPS	250 FPS
4K
low	331 FPS	265 FPS
medium	295 FPS	241 FPS
high	268 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	236 FPS	176 FPS

Open EPYC 9555P Open EPYC 9654

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9555P	EPYC 9654
1080p
low	747 FPS	671 FPS
medium	634 FPS	560 FPS
high	590 FPS	522 FPS
ultra	519 FPS	454 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	511 FPS
medium	474 FPS	425 FPS
high	434 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	405 FPS	376 FPS
medium	326 FPS	293 FPS
high	288 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	210 FPS

Open EPYC 9555P Open EPYC 9654

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9555P	EPYC 9654
1080p
low	1005 FPS	902 FPS
medium	902 FPS	822 FPS
high	778 FPS	708 FPS
ultra	702 FPS	623 FPS
1440p
low	809 FPS	724 FPS
medium	704 FPS	631 FPS
high	603 FPS	540 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	461 FPS
4K
low	574 FPS	519 FPS
medium	510 FPS	464 FPS
high	447 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	392 FPS	350 FPS

Open EPYC 9555P Open EPYC 9654

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9555P and EPYC 9654

EPYC 9555P

The EPYC 9555P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,441 points. Launch price was $7,983.

EPYC 9654

The EPYC 9654 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 119,246 points. Launch price was $11,805.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9555P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9654 offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9654 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555P versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9555P (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9555P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9654 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9555P scores 135,441 against the EPYC 9654's 119,246 — a 12.7% lead for the EPYC 9555P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,815 vs 1,250, a 77% lead for the EPYC 9555P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,406 vs 20,000 (38.1% advantage for the EPYC 9555P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9555P vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9654.

Feature	EPYC 9555P	EPYC 9654
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	96 / 192+50%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+19%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+33%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	384 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	135,441+14%	119,246
Geekbench 6 Single	2,815+125%	1,250
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,406+47%	20,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555P) and SP5 (EPYC 9654).

Feature	EPYC 9555P	EPYC 9654
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB	6 TB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9555P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9654 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555P rivals Xeon 6979P; EPYC 9654 rivals Xeon 8592+.

Feature	EPYC 9555P	EPYC 9654
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Data Center

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9555P launched at $7983 MSRP, while the EPYC 9654 debuted at $11805. On MSRP ($7983 vs $11805), the EPYC 9555P is $3822 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555P delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 10.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9654 — making the EPYC 9555P the 50.7% better value option.