PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9475F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.1 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($7,592 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌515.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 65W.

Ryzen 5 5600X

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,293 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).
✅Delivers 352.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 400W, a 335W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9475F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 122,476).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9475F, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9475F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9475F

2024

Ryzen 5 5600X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,293 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).
✅Delivers 352.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 400W, a 335W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.1 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($7,592 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌515.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9475F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 122,476).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9475F, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9475F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9475F better than Ryzen 5 5600X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9475F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9475F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 29.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 256 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9475F is the better fit. You are getting 460.7% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9475F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 5600X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9475F is 2439.1% more expensive on MSRP at $7,592 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 29.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 5600X is also 352.9% better value on MSRP (73.1 vs 16.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9475F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9475F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 5600X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	315 FPS	203 FPS
medium	289 FPS	174 FPS
high	240 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	203 FPS	107 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	169 FPS
medium	230 FPS	141 FPS
high	178 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	157 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	191 FPS	85 FPS
medium	157 FPS	76 FPS
high	120 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	47 FPS

Open EPYC 9475F Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	725 FPS	464 FPS
medium	618 FPS	387 FPS
high	485 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	291 FPS
1440p
low	579 FPS	397 FPS
medium	510 FPS	334 FPS
high	419 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	341 FPS	253 FPS
4K
low	338 FPS	263 FPS
medium	300 FPS	226 FPS
high	270 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	239 FPS	171 FPS

Open EPYC 9475F Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	906 FPS	546 FPS
medium	738 FPS	473 FPS
high	668 FPS	432 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	358 FPS
1440p
low	702 FPS	508 FPS
medium	570 FPS	413 FPS
high	503 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	312 FPS
4K
low	496 FPS	348 FPS
medium	411 FPS	292 FPS
high	365 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	302 FPS	199 FPS

Open EPYC 9475F Open Ryzen 5 5600X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	1139 FPS	546 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	546 FPS
high	901 FPS	546 FPS
ultra	812 FPS	546 FPS
1440p
low	888 FPS	546 FPS
medium	782 FPS	546 FPS
high	687 FPS	546 FPS
ultra	598 FPS	524 FPS
4K
low	648 FPS	529 FPS
medium	578 FPS	484 FPS
high	513 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	379 FPS

Open EPYC 9475F Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9475F and Ryzen 5 5600X

EPYC 9475F

The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.

Ryzen 5 5600X

The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9475F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9475F has 42 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 4.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9475F (base: 3.65 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 9475F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9475F scores 122,476 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 139.5% lead for the EPYC 9475F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9475F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.

Feature	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen 5 5600X
Cores / Threads	48 / 96+700%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+4%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.65 GHz	3.7 GHz+1%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+700%	32 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	122,476+461%	21,845
Geekbench 6 Single	1,960	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	45,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9475F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9475F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the EPYC 9475F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9475F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9475F) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9475F) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the EPYC 9475F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9475F) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).

Feature	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen 5 5600X
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9475F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9475F targets Server, Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P.

Feature	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen 5 5600X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	Server	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9475F launched at $7592 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($7592 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $7293 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9475F delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 127.7% better value option.