PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9475F

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,407 less on MSRP ($7,592 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($7,592 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,960 vs 2,100).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (45,000 vs 81,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

2023

Why buy it

✅+7.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).

EPYC 9475F

2024

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,407 less on MSRP ($7,592 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($7,592 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅+7.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,960 vs 2,100).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (45,000 vs 81,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX better than EPYC 9475F?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 80% better Geekbench multi-core, and 16.8% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is the better fit. You are getting 80% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9475F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is 31.7% more expensive on MSRP at $9,999 MSRP versus $7,592 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9475F is also 12.8% better value on MSRP (16.1 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9475F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9475F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
1080p
low	315 FPS	304 FPS
medium	289 FPS	288 FPS
high	240 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	203 FPS	194 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	272 FPS
medium	230 FPS	233 FPS
high	178 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	157 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	191 FPS	188 FPS
medium	157 FPS	160 FPS
high	120 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	109 FPS

Open EPYC 9475F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
1080p
low	725 FPS	780 FPS
medium	618 FPS	676 FPS
high	485 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	470 FPS
1440p
low	579 FPS	648 FPS
medium	510 FPS	578 FPS
high	419 FPS	477 FPS
ultra	341 FPS	382 FPS
4K
low	338 FPS	360 FPS
medium	300 FPS	324 FPS
high	270 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	239 FPS	260 FPS

Open EPYC 9475F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
1080p
low	906 FPS	795 FPS
medium	738 FPS	667 FPS
high	668 FPS	590 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	499 FPS
1440p
low	702 FPS	704 FPS
medium	570 FPS	593 FPS
high	503 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	436 FPS
4K
low	496 FPS	495 FPS
medium	411 FPS	420 FPS
high	365 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	302 FPS	317 FPS

Open EPYC 9475F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
1080p
low	1139 FPS	1122 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	997 FPS
high	901 FPS	874 FPS
ultra	812 FPS	771 FPS
1440p
low	888 FPS	924 FPS
medium	782 FPS	801 FPS
high	687 FPS	706 FPS
ultra	598 FPS	614 FPS
4K
low	648 FPS	674 FPS
medium	578 FPS	598 FPS
high	513 FPS	537 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9475F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9475F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

EPYC 9475F

The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 143,017 points. Launch price was $9,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9475F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX (base: 3.65 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9475F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9475F scores 122,476 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX's 143,017 — a 15.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 2,100, a 6.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 81,000 (57.1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9475F vs 384 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

Feature	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	96 / 192+100%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz	5.1 GHz+6%
Base Clock	3.65 GHz+46%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	384 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Storm Peak (2023)
PassMark	122,476	143,017+17%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	148,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,960	2,100+7%
Geekbench 6 Multi	45,000	81,000+80%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9475F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9475F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9475F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9475F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX).

Feature	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Socket	SP5	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+200%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9475F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9475F targets Server, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX targets Workstation / Scientific Computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.

Feature	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	true
Target Use	Server	Workstation / Scientific Computing

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9475F launched at $7592 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX debuted at $9999. On MSRP ($7592 vs $9999), the EPYC 9475F is $2407 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9475F delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — making the EPYC 9475F the 12% better value option.