PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9135

2024

Why buy it

✅+104.1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.6 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($1,214 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌90.5% higher power demand at 200W vs 105W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $915 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 98.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 47.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 200W, a 95W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9135 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 57,808).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9135, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 9135

2024

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅+104.1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $915 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 98.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 47.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 200W, a 95W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9135 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.6 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($1,214 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌90.5% higher power demand at 200W vs 105W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 57,808).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9135, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9135 better than Ryzen 5 7600X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9135 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9135 is the better fit. You are getting 104.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9135 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 7600X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9135 is 306.0% more expensive on MSRP at $1,214 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you 104.1% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 5 7600X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 7600X is also 98.9% better value on MSRP (94.7 vs 47.6 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9135 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9135 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 7600X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9135	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	172 FPS	266 FPS
medium	139 FPS	246 FPS
high	119 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	179 FPS
1440p
low	152 FPS	226 FPS
medium	120 FPS	189 FPS
high	99 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	157 FPS
medium	69 FPS	131 FPS
high	55 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	87 FPS

Open EPYC 9135 Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9135	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	496 FPS	649 FPS
medium	439 FPS	524 FPS
high	341 FPS	436 FPS
ultra	293 FPS	386 FPS
1440p
low	427 FPS	544 FPS
medium	382 FPS	455 FPS
high	309 FPS	388 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	329 FPS
4K
low	267 FPS	341 FPS
medium	242 FPS	290 FPS
high	211 FPS	271 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	232 FPS

Open EPYC 9135 Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9135	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	729 FPS	708 FPS
medium	607 FPS	652 FPS
high	552 FPS	571 FPS
ultra	489 FPS	484 FPS
1440p
low	559 FPS	708 FPS
medium	463 FPS	554 FPS
high	415 FPS	479 FPS
ultra	362 FPS	409 FPS
4K
low	407 FPS	463 FPS
medium	325 FPS	392 FPS
high	287 FPS	341 FPS
ultra	232 FPS	281 FPS

Open EPYC 9135 Open Ryzen 5 7600X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9135	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	929 FPS	708 FPS
medium	846 FPS	708 FPS
high	732 FPS	708 FPS
ultra	660 FPS	708 FPS
1440p
low	735 FPS	708 FPS
medium	652 FPS	708 FPS
high	561 FPS	658 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	571 FPS
4K
low	524 FPS	560 FPS
medium	475 FPS	502 FPS
high	417 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	365 FPS	391 FPS

Open EPYC 9135 Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9135 and Ryzen 5 7600X

EPYC 9135

The EPYC 9135 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,808 points. Launch price was $1,214.

Ryzen 5 7600X

The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9135 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9135 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9135 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 20.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 3.65 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 9135 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9135 scores 57,808 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 68.5% lead for the EPYC 9135. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9135 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.

Feature	EPYC 9135	Ryzen 5 7600X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+167%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5.3 GHz+23%
Base Clock	3.65 GHz	4.7 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+100%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	6 MB+500%
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	57,808+104%	28,325
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	15,300
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,900
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	13,800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9135 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9135 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X — the EPYC 9135 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9135 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9135) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9135) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the EPYC 9135 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9135) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).

Feature	EPYC 9135	Ryzen 5 7600X
Socket	SP5	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	6000+119900%	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	6144	128 GB+2184433%
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9135) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9135 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9135 rivals Xeon Platinum 8558P; Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.

Feature	EPYC 9135	Ryzen 5 7600X
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9135 launched at $1214 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($1214 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $915 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9135 delivers 47.6 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 66.2% better value option.