
EPYC 8534P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 8534P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+220.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.7% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,200 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 424.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 71,900).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8534P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8534P moves to SP6 and DDR5.
EPYC 8534P
2023Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+220.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.7% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,200 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 424.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 71,900).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8534P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8534P moves to SP6 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 8534P better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 8534P | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 8534P | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 415 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 8534P | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 860 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 786 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 760 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 682 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 587 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 498 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 8534P | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1022 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 912 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 771 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 711 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 597 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 491 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 599 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 523 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8534P and Ryzen 7 3700X

EPYC 8534P
EPYC 8534P
The EPYC 8534P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 71,900 points. Launch price was $4,950.


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8534P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 8534P has 56 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8534P versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 34.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 8534P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8534P scores 71,900 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 104.9% lead for the EPYC 8534P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8534P vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+700% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4.4 GHz+42% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+57% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+300% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 71,900+221% | 22,430 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,678 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,882 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8534P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 8534P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the EPYC 8534P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8534P supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 160% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8534P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8534P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 8534P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8534P) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 GB+800% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96+300% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (EPYC 8534P) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: EPYC 8534P targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 8534P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Cloud Server | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 8534P launched at $5529 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($5529 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $5200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8534P delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 135.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5529 | $329-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.0 | 68.2+425% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












