EPYC 8324PN
Popular choices:
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 8324PN
2023Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 21,845).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +87.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.
EPYC 8324PN
2023Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +87.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 21,845).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than EPYC 8324PN?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 47 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 171 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 199 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 5 5600X
EPYC 8324PN
EPYC 8324PN
The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.
Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8324PN packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 2.05 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 8324PN uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324PN scores 8,375 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 89.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+433% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+53% |
| Base Clock | 2.05 GHz | 3.7 GHz+80% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+300% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 8,375 | 21,845+161% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8324PN uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 8324PN) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | EPYC 8324PN | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 5 5600X
