EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E3-1270 v5

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 128 MB vs 8 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.

Xeon E3-1270 v5

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (8 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark (8,318 vs 8,375).
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Xeon E3-1270 v5

2015

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 128 MB vs 8 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (8 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark (8,318 vs 8,375).
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8324PN better than Xeon E3-1270 v5?

Yes. EPYC 8324PN is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 1.4% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 8324PN is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 8 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8324PN is the better fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1500% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8324PN still looks like the safer overall buy. EPYC 8324PN is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8324PN is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2015), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 8 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 4/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 8324PN Benchmark Check

Xeon E3-1270 v5 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 8324PN	Xeon E3-1270 v5
1080p
low	159 FPS	208 FPS
medium	131 FPS	164 FPS
high	110 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	92 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	179 FPS
medium	114 FPS	140 FPS
high	90 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	71 FPS
medium	58 FPS	60 FPS
high	45 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	37 FPS

Open EPYC 8324PN Open Xeon E3-1270 v5

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 8324PN	Xeon E3-1270 v5
1080p
low	209 FPS	208 FPS
medium	209 FPS	186 FPS
high	174 FPS	166 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	128 FPS
1440p
low	194 FPS	189 FPS
medium	176 FPS	162 FPS
high	150 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	116 FPS	116 FPS
4K
low	120 FPS	149 FPS
medium	111 FPS	132 FPS
high	97 FPS	109 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	81 FPS

Open EPYC 8324PN Open Xeon E3-1270 v5

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 8324PN	Xeon E3-1270 v5
1080p
low	209 FPS	208 FPS
medium	209 FPS	208 FPS
high	209 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	208 FPS
1440p
low	209 FPS	208 FPS
medium	209 FPS	208 FPS
high	209 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	208 FPS
4K
low	209 FPS	208 FPS
medium	209 FPS	208 FPS
high	209 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	208 FPS

Open EPYC 8324PN Open Xeon E3-1270 v5

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 8324PN	Xeon E3-1270 v5
1080p
low	209 FPS	208 FPS
medium	209 FPS	208 FPS
high	209 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	208 FPS
1440p
low	209 FPS	208 FPS
medium	209 FPS	208 FPS
high	209 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	208 FPS
4K
low	209 FPS	208 FPS
medium	209 FPS	208 FPS
high	209 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	208 FPS

Open EPYC 8324PN Open Xeon E3-1270 v5

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8324PN and Xeon E3-1270 v5

EPYC 8324PN

The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.

Xeon E3-1270 v5

The Xeon E3-1270 v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 8,318 points. Launch price was $339.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8324PN packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon E3-1270 v5 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1270 v5 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1270 v5 (base: 2.05 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 8324PN uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon E3-1270 v5 uses Skylake-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324PN scores 8,375 against the Xeon E3-1270 v5's 8,318 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 8324PN. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1270 v5.

Feature	EPYC 8324PN	Xeon E3-1270 v5
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+700%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4 GHz+33%
Base Clock	2.05 GHz	3.6 GHz+76%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+1500%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Skylake-DT (2015)
PassMark	8,375	8,318

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324PN uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E3-1270 v5 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.