
EPYC 7642
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7642
2019Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 350W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (59,333 vs 60,054).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 31.6 PassMark/$ ($4,775 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,876 less on MSRP ($1,899 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 154.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.6 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌55.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 225W.
EPYC 7642
2019Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 350W, a 125W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,876 less on MSRP ($1,899 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 154.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.6 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (59,333 vs 60,054).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 31.6 PassMark/$ ($4,775 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌55.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX better than EPYC 7642?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7642 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 104 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7642 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 776 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 635 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 399 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 417 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 325 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 227 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7642 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 629 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 415 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 389 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7642 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 909 FPS | 1106 FPS |
| medium | 829 FPS | 991 FPS |
| high | 715 FPS | 867 FPS |
| ultra | 619 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 714 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 624 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 535 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 401 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 429 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7642 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

EPYC 7642
EPYC 7642
The EPYC 7642 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 59,333 points. Launch price was $4,775.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,054 points. Launch price was $1,899.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7642 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7642 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7642 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — a 43.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 7642 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7642 scores 59,333 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX's 60,054 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7642 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7642 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+200% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 5.3 GHz+56% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+88% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+300% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 59,333 | 60,054+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 36,742 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,020 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 21,079 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7642 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7642 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — the EPYC 7642 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7642 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7642) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7642 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 1024 GB+26214300% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7642) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 7642 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX rivals Xeon w7-2495X.
| Feature | EPYC 7642 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7642 launched at $4775 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX debuted at $1899. On MSRP ($4775 vs $1899), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX is $2876 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7642 delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 31.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX the 87.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7642 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4775 | $1899-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4 | 31.6+155% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












