
EPYC 7552
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7552
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 350W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $1,340 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,685 less on MSRP ($1,340 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 197.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.4 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($1,340 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (56,854 vs 57,414).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 192 MB).
- ❌75% higher power demand at 350W vs 200W.
EPYC 7552
2019Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 350W, a 150W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,685 less on MSRP ($1,340 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 197.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.4 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($1,340 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $1,340 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (56,854 vs 57,414).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 192 MB).
- ❌75% higher power demand at 350W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX better than EPYC 7552?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7552 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 98 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7552 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 791 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 650 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 233 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7552 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 886 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 704 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 365 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7552 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 890 FPS | 1106 FPS |
| medium | 809 FPS | 991 FPS |
| high | 694 FPS | 867 FPS |
| ultra | 601 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 705 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 525 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 340 FPS | 429 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7552 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

EPYC 7552
EPYC 7552
The EPYC 7552 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 57,414 points. Launch price was $4,025.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 56,854 points. Launch price was $2,000.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7552 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7552 has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7552 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — a 48.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 7552 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7552 scores 57,414 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX's 56,854 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 7552. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7552 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+300% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 5.4 GHz+64% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz+114% |
| L3 Cache | 192 MB (total)+200% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 57,414 | 56,854 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7552 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7552 versus 6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7552 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7552) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 6400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+100% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7552) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 7552 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX rivals Xeon w7-3545.
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7552 launched at $4025 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX debuted at $1340. On MSRP ($4025 vs $1340), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX is $2685 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7552 delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 42.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX the 99.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4025 | $1340-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 42.4+197% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












