EPYC 7552 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

AMD

EPYC 7552

48 Cores96 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

12 Cores24 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7552

2019

Why buy it

  • +1% higher PassMark.
  • +200% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Draws 200W instead of 350W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $1,340 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +38.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $2,685 less on MSRP ($1,340 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
  • Delivers 197.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.4 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($1,340 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (56,854 vs 57,414).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 192 MB).
  • 75% higher power demand at 350W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX better than EPYC 7552?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX is ahead with a 38.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7552 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. EPYC 7552 also has the bigger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7552 is the better fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX is $2,685 cheaper on MSRP at $1,340 MSRP versus $4,025 MSRP, and it gives you a 38.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7552 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. It is also 197.4% better value on MSRP (42.4 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with sTR5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 7552Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
1080p
low181 FPS278 FPS
medium158 FPS253 FPS
high123 FPS216 FPS
ultra100 FPS188 FPS
1440p
low152 FPS262 FPS
medium128 FPS214 FPS
high96 FPS169 FPS
ultra79 FPS152 FPS
4K
low71 FPS180 FPS
medium63 FPS147 FPS
high48 FPS111 FPS
ultra39 FPS98 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 7552Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
1080p
low236 FPS791 FPS
medium211 FPS650 FPS
high175 FPS485 FPS
ultra142 FPS409 FPS
1440p
low194 FPS651 FPS
medium177 FPS555 FPS
high152 FPS428 FPS
ultra119 FPS333 FPS
4K
low120 FPS366 FPS
medium112 FPS315 FPS
high98 FPS277 FPS
ultra81 FPS233 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 7552Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
1080p
low587 FPS886 FPS
medium492 FPS704 FPS
high437 FPS622 FPS
ultra365 FPS534 FPS
1440p
low492 FPS712 FPS
medium419 FPS566 FPS
high374 FPS488 FPS
ultra318 FPS414 FPS
4K
low371 FPS507 FPS
medium298 FPS418 FPS
high265 FPS375 FPS
ultra215 FPS315 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 7552Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
1080p
low890 FPS1106 FPS
medium809 FPS991 FPS
high694 FPS867 FPS
ultra601 FPS781 FPS
1440p
low705 FPS860 FPS
medium615 FPS759 FPS
high525 FPS664 FPS
ultra446 FPS576 FPS
4K
low499 FPS632 FPS
medium448 FPS562 FPS
high394 FPS496 FPS
ultra340 FPS429 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7552 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

AMD

EPYC 7552

The EPYC 7552 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 57,414 points. Launch price was $4,025.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 56,854 points. Launch price was $2,000.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7552 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7552 has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7552 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — a 48.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 7552 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7552 scores 57,414 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX's 56,854 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 7552. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7552 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX.

FeatureEPYC 7552Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
Cores / Threads
48 / 96+300%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
5.4 GHz+64%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
4.7 GHz+114%
L3 Cache
192 MB (total)+200%
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark
57,414
56,854
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7552 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7552 versus 6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7552 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7552) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX).

FeatureEPYC 7552Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
Socket
SP3
sTR5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity
4096+100%
2048
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7552) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 7552 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX rivals Xeon w7-3545.

FeatureEPYC 7552Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7552 launched at $4025 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX debuted at $1340. On MSRP ($4025 vs $1340), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX is $2685 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7552 delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 42.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX the 99.4% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7552Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP
$4025
$1340-67%
Performance per Dollar
14.3
42.4+197%
Release Date
2019
2025