PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7552

2019

Why buy it

✅+156% higher PassMark.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,696 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
✅Delivers 377.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 57,414).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 192 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7552, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7552

2019

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅+156% higher PassMark.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,696 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
✅Delivers 377.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 57,414).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 192 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7552, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than EPYC 7552?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7552 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7552 is the better fit. You are getting 156% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is $3,696 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $4,025 MSRP, and it gives you a 26.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7552 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 156% better PassMark. It is also 377.9% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7552 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7552	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	181 FPS	200 FPS
medium	158 FPS	163 FPS
high	123 FPS	137 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	152 FPS	156 FPS
medium	128 FPS	121 FPS
high	96 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	84 FPS
medium	63 FPS	71 FPS
high	48 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	44 FPS

Open EPYC 7552 Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7552	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	236 FPS	561 FPS
medium	211 FPS	525 FPS
high	175 FPS	428 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	383 FPS
1440p
low	194 FPS	545 FPS
medium	177 FPS	471 FPS
high	152 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	120 FPS	350 FPS
medium	112 FPS	304 FPS
high	98 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	242 FPS

Open EPYC 7552 Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7552	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	587 FPS	561 FPS
medium	492 FPS	561 FPS
high	437 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	365 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	492 FPS	561 FPS
medium	419 FPS	561 FPS
high	374 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	470 FPS
4K
low	371 FPS	499 FPS
medium	298 FPS	394 FPS
high	265 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	215 FPS	275 FPS

Open EPYC 7552 Open Ryzen 7 3700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7552	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	890 FPS	561 FPS
medium	809 FPS	561 FPS
high	694 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	601 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	705 FPS	561 FPS
medium	615 FPS	561 FPS
high	525 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	446 FPS	555 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	561 FPS
medium	448 FPS	501 FPS
high	394 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	340 FPS	396 FPS

Open EPYC 7552 Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7552 and Ryzen 7 3700X

EPYC 7552

The EPYC 7552 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 57,414 points. Launch price was $4,025.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7552 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7552 has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7552 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7552 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7552 scores 57,414 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 87.6% lead for the EPYC 7552. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7552 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	EPYC 7552	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	48 / 96+500%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	4.4 GHz+33%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+64%
L3 Cache	192 MB (total)+500%	32 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	57,414+156%	22,430

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7552 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7552 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the EPYC 7552 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7552 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7552) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7552) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 7552 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7552) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	EPYC 7552	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	SP3	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+79900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	128 GB+3276700%
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7552) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7552 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	EPYC 7552	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7552 launched at $4025 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($4025 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $3696 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7552 delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 130.8% better value option.