PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4364P

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 38,581).

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌
75.2% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

EPYC 4364P

2024

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 38,581).

Trade-offs

❌
75.2% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than EPYC 4364P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 4364P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 10.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better fit. You are getting 83.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 75.2% more expensive on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and it gives you a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 4.0% better value on MSRP (89.2 vs 85.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 4364P Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 7950X3D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	249 FPS	291 FPS
medium	232 FPS	265 FPS
high	201 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	218 FPS	275 FPS
medium	183 FPS	227 FPS
high	152 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	156 FPS
4K
low	152 FPS	190 FPS
medium	127 FPS	156 FPS
high	99 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	107 FPS

Open EPYC 4364P Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	710 FPS	734 FPS
medium	565 FPS	627 FPS
high	465 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	413 FPS	393 FPS
1440p
low	597 FPS	602 FPS
medium	499 FPS	536 FPS
high	417 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	326 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	338 FPS
medium	297 FPS	305 FPS
high	278 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	241 FPS	229 FPS

Open EPYC 4364P Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	855 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	855 FPS	1122 FPS
high	855 FPS	1062 FPS
ultra	855 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	855 FPS	936 FPS
medium	855 FPS	845 FPS
high	790 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	582 FPS	574 FPS
medium	500 FPS	498 FPS
high	450 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	380 FPS	378 FPS

Open EPYC 4364P Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	855 FPS	1082 FPS
medium	855 FPS	973 FPS
high	855 FPS	854 FPS
ultra	852 FPS	766 FPS
1440p
low	855 FPS	853 FPS
medium	855 FPS	751 FPS
high	766 FPS	659 FPS
ultra	647 FPS	569 FPS
4K
low	682 FPS	623 FPS
medium	600 FPS	555 FPS
high	531 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	426 FPS

Open EPYC 4364P Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

EPYC 4364P

The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4364P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.5 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 4364P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4364P scores 34,215 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 58.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 38,581 (59% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,085 vs 2,926, a 5.3% lead for the EPYC 4364P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,594 vs 19,643 (23% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4364P vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

Feature	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz	5.7 GHz+6%
Base Clock	4.5 GHz+7%	4.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	34,215	62,323+82%
Cinebench R23 Multi	21,000	38,581+84%
Geekbench 6 Single	3,085+5%	2,926
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,594	19,643+26%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).

Feature	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Socket	AM5	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4364P) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.

Feature	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, AMD-Vi	true
Target Use	Entry Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4364P launched at $399 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($399 vs $699), the EPYC 4364P is $300 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4364P delivers 85.8 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 3.9% better value option.