PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4364P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 85.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 7 5800X

2020

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 34,215).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.7 vs 85.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4364P moves to AM5 and DDR5.

EPYC 4364P

2024

Ryzen 7 5800X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 85.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 34,215).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.7 vs 85.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4364P moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4364P better than Ryzen 7 5800X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 4364P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5800X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4364P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 16.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4364P is the better fit. You are getting 23.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4364P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 4364P is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $449 MSRP, and it gives you a 16.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 38.9% better value on MSRP (85.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4364P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 4364P Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 5800X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	249 FPS	206 FPS
medium	232 FPS	178 FPS
high	201 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	218 FPS	170 FPS
medium	183 FPS	142 FPS
high	152 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	152 FPS	83 FPS
medium	127 FPS	74 FPS
high	99 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	46 FPS

Open EPYC 4364P Open Ryzen 7 5800X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	710 FPS	662 FPS
medium	565 FPS	558 FPS
high	465 FPS	466 FPS
ultra	413 FPS	417 FPS
1440p
low	597 FPS	563 FPS
medium	499 FPS	493 FPS
high	417 FPS	423 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	361 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	350 FPS
medium	297 FPS	308 FPS
high	278 FPS	288 FPS
ultra	241 FPS	250 FPS

Open EPYC 4364P Open Ryzen 7 5800X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	855 FPS	693 FPS
medium	855 FPS	651 FPS
high	855 FPS	570 FPS
ultra	855 FPS	464 FPS
1440p
low	855 FPS	693 FPS
medium	855 FPS	573 FPS
high	790 FPS	498 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	413 FPS
4K
low	582 FPS	484 FPS
medium	500 FPS	410 FPS
high	450 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	380 FPS	302 FPS

Open EPYC 4364P Open Ryzen 7 5800X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	855 FPS	693 FPS
medium	855 FPS	693 FPS
high	855 FPS	693 FPS
ultra	852 FPS	693 FPS
1440p
low	855 FPS	693 FPS
medium	855 FPS	693 FPS
high	766 FPS	672 FPS
ultra	647 FPS	593 FPS
4K
low	682 FPS	604 FPS
medium	600 FPS	550 FPS
high	531 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	436 FPS

Open EPYC 4364P Open Ryzen 7 5800X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 7 5800X

EPYC 4364P

The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.

Ryzen 7 5800X

The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 7 5800X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 13.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 4364P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4364P scores 34,215 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 21% lead for the EPYC 4364P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4364P vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.

Feature	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 7 5800X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+15%	4.7 GHz
Base Clock	4.5 GHz+18%	3.8 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	32 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	5 nm-29%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	34,215+23%	27,712
Cinebench R23 Multi	21,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	3,085	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,594	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4364P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4364P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X — the EPYC 4364P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4364P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the EPYC 4364P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).

Feature	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 7 5800X
Socket	AM5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28+17%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4364P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). The EPYC 4364P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 5800X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server, Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488.

Feature	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 7 5800X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, AMD-Vi	AMD-V
Target Use	Entry Server	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4364P launched at $399 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($399 vs $449), the EPYC 4364P is $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4364P delivers 85.8 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the EPYC 4364P the 32.6% better value option.