
EPYC 4364P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4364P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 21,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4364P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4364P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4364P
2024Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 21,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4364P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4364P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4364P better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 710 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 245 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 855 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 855 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 790 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 855 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 852 FPS | 665 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 607 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 533 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 682 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 600 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 531 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 7 5700X

EPYC 4364P
EPYC 4364P
The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 7 5700X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 16% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 4364P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4364P scores 34,215 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 25% lead for the EPYC 4364P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 14,000 (40% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,085 vs 2,116, a 37.3% lead for the EPYC 4364P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,594 vs 9,715 (46.5% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+17% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+32% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 34,215+29% | 26,609 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000+50% | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,085+46% | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,594+61% | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4364P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4364P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the EPYC 4364P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4364P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the EPYC 4364P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4364P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). The EPYC 4364P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server, Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488; Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Entry Server | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4364P launched at $399 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5700X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($399 vs $299), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4364P delivers 85.8 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 3.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $299-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 85.8 | 89.0+4% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












