
EPYC 4364P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4364P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 85.8 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 85.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 21,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
EPYC 4364P
2024Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 85.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 85.8 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 21,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4364P better than Ryzen 5 7600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 710 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 855 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 855 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 790 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 855 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 852 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 682 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 600 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 531 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 5 7600X

EPYC 4364P
EPYC 4364P
The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4364P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 4364P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 1.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 4364P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4364P scores 34,215 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 18.8% lead for the EPYC 4364P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 15,300 (31.4% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,085 vs 2,900, a 6.2% lead for the EPYC 4364P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,594 vs 13,800 (12.2% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+2% | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 6 MB+500% |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 34,215+21% | 28,325 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000+37% | 15,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,085+6% | 2,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,594+13% | 13,800 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4364P) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server, Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488; Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Entry Server | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4364P launched at $399 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($399 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4364P delivers 85.8 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 10% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $299-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 85.8 | 94.7+10% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












