PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4364P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
100.5% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4364P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 21,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4364P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4364P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

EPYC 4364P

2024

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4364P.

Trade-offs

❌
100.5% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 21,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4364P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4364P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4364P better than Ryzen 5 3600?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 4364P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4364P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 36.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4364P is the better fit. You are getting 121.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4364P is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 4364P is 100.5% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 36.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 3600 is also 3.6% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 85.8 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4364P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 4364P Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 3600 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low	249 FPS	200 FPS
medium	232 FPS	161 FPS
high	201 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	218 FPS	154 FPS
medium	183 FPS	119 FPS
high	152 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	152 FPS	70 FPS
medium	127 FPS	58 FPS
high	99 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	36 FPS

Open EPYC 4364P Open Ryzen 5 3600

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low	710 FPS	442 FPS
medium	565 FPS	404 FPS
high	465 FPS	332 FPS
ultra	413 FPS	295 FPS
1440p
low	597 FPS	420 FPS
medium	499 FPS	359 FPS
high	417 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	263 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	297 FPS
medium	297 FPS	259 FPS
high	278 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	241 FPS	201 FPS

Open EPYC 4364P Open Ryzen 5 3600

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low	855 FPS	442 FPS
medium	855 FPS	442 FPS
high	855 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	855 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	855 FPS	442 FPS
medium	855 FPS	442 FPS
high	790 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	582 FPS	442 FPS
medium	500 FPS	361 FPS
high	450 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	380 FPS	242 FPS

Open EPYC 4364P Open Ryzen 5 3600

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low	855 FPS	442 FPS
medium	855 FPS	442 FPS
high	855 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	852 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	855 FPS	442 FPS
medium	855 FPS	442 FPS
high	766 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	647 FPS	442 FPS
4K
low	682 FPS	442 FPS
medium	600 FPS	442 FPS
high	531 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	357 FPS

Open EPYC 4364P Open Ryzen 5 3600

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 5 3600

EPYC 4364P

The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4364P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 4364P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 25% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 4364P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4364P scores 34,215 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 63.7% lead for the EPYC 4364P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 9,500 (75.4% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,085 vs 1,295, a 81.7% lead for the EPYC 4364P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,594 vs 1,898 (156.6% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+29%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	4.5 GHz+25%	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	5 nm-29%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	34,215+93%	17,685
Cinebench R23 Multi	21,000+121%	9,500
Geekbench 6 Single	3,085+138%	1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,594+722%	1,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4364P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4364P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the EPYC 4364P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4364P) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the EPYC 4364P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

Feature	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 5 3600
Socket	AM5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	28+17%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4364P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The EPYC 4364P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

Feature	EPYC 4364P	Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, AMD-Vi	Yes
Target Use	Entry Server	Gaming/Budget Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4364P launched at $399 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($399 vs $199), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4364P delivers 85.8 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 3.6% better value option.