Core Ultra 5 236V vs Ryzen Z1

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 236V

2024

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z1 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,313 vs 18,406).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen Z1

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 17W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core Ultra 5 236V

2024

Ryzen Z1

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 17W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z1 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,313 vs 18,406).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Z1 better than Core Ultra 5 236V?

Yes. Ryzen Z1 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 18.9% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Z1 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 18.9% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Z1 is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Z1 still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen Z1 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 18.9% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 236V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core Ultra 5 236V Benchmark Check

Ryzen Z1 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core Ultra 5 236V	Ryzen Z1
1080p
low	180 FPS	262 FPS
medium	147 FPS	234 FPS
high	120 FPS	195 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	167 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	231 FPS
medium	118 FPS	187 FPS
high	96 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	83 FPS	162 FPS
medium	71 FPS	133 FPS
high	57 FPS	102 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	89 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 236V Open Ryzen Z1

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core Ultra 5 236V	Ryzen Z1
1080p
low	212 FPS	433 FPS
medium	176 FPS	339 FPS
high	158 FPS	291 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	250 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	360 FPS
medium	154 FPS	295 FPS
high	142 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	219 FPS
4K
low	137 FPS	271 FPS
medium	122 FPS	227 FPS
high	115 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	171 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 236V Open Ryzen Z1

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core Ultra 5 236V	Ryzen Z1
1080p
low	458 FPS	460 FPS
medium	458 FPS	460 FPS
high	458 FPS	460 FPS
ultra	458 FPS	460 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	460 FPS
medium	458 FPS	460 FPS
high	458 FPS	460 FPS
ultra	458 FPS	441 FPS
4K
low	458 FPS	460 FPS
medium	458 FPS	437 FPS
high	404 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	306 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 236V Open Ryzen Z1

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core Ultra 5 236V	Ryzen Z1
1080p
low	458 FPS	460 FPS
medium	458 FPS	460 FPS
high	458 FPS	460 FPS
ultra	458 FPS	460 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	460 FPS
medium	458 FPS	460 FPS
high	458 FPS	460 FPS
ultra	458 FPS	460 FPS
4K
low	458 FPS	460 FPS
medium	458 FPS	460 FPS
high	458 FPS	434 FPS
ultra	418 FPS	370 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 236V Open Ryzen Z1

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 236V and Ryzen Z1

Core Ultra 5 236V

The Core Ultra 5 236V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,313 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Z1

The Ryzen Z1 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,406 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 236V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Z1 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 236V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 236V versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen Z1 — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z1 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 236V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Z1 uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 236V scores 18,313 against the Ryzen Z1's 18,406 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen Z1. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 236V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Z1.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 236V	Ryzen Z1
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz	4.9 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	2.5 MB (per core)+150%	1 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm-25%	4 nm
Architecture	Lunar Lake (2024)	Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
PassMark	18,313	18,406

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 236V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Z1 uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.