
Core Ultra 5 236V
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 236V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,313 vs 18,409).
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 236V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 236V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 5 236V
2024Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,313 vs 18,409).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 236V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 236V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 236V better than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 236V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 236V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 173 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 236V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 236V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 329 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 236V and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE

Core Ultra 5 236V
Core Ultra 5 236V
The Core Ultra 5 236V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,313 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,409 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 236V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 236V versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 236V (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 236V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 236V scores 18,313 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE's 18,409 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 236V vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 236V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+9% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core)+400% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 18,313 | 18,409 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 236V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 236V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 5 236V launched at $0 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE debuted at $309. On MSRP ($0 vs $309), the Core Ultra 5 236V is $309 cheaper.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 236V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $309 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 59.6 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












