
Core Ultra 5 235U
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2288G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 235U
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 95W, a 81W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,397 vs 17,465).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2288G, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E-2288G
2019Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌578.6% higher power demand at 95W vs 14W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 235U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 5 235U
2025Xeon E-2288G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 95W, a 81W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,397 vs 17,465).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2288G, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌578.6% higher power demand at 95W vs 14W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 235U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2288G better than Core Ultra 5 235U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 235U | Xeon E-2288G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 235U | Xeon E-2288G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 278 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 235U | Xeon E-2288G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 283 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 235U | Xeon E-2288G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 380 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 235U and Xeon E-2288G

Core Ultra 5 235U
Core Ultra 5 235U
The Core Ultra 5 235U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,397 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2288G
Xeon E-2288G
The Xeon E-2288G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 17,465 points. Launch price was $539.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 235U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon E-2288G offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 235U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235U versus 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2288G — a 2% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2288G (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 235U uses the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon E-2288G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 235U scores 17,397 against the Xeon E-2288G's 17,465 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E-2288G. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core Ultra 5 235U vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2288G.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235U | Xeon E-2288G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | — | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-U (2025) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,397 | 17,465 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 235U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E-2288G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235U | Xeon E-2288G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












