
Core Ultra 5 235U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 235U
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,397 vs 17,466).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 14W vs 6W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 14W, a 8W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 740M, while Core Ultra 5 235U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core Ultra 5 235U
2025Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 14W, a 8W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 740M, while Core Ultra 5 235U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,397 vs 17,466).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 14W vs 6W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U better than Core Ultra 5 235U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 235U | Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 235U | Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 169 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 235U | Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 362 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 299 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 235U | Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 377 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 235U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U

Core Ultra 5 235U
Core Ultra 5 235U
The Core Ultra 5 235U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,397 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x-7500, DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 17,466 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 235U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 235U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235U versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 235U uses the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 235U scores 17,397 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U's 17,466 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core Ultra 5 235U vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235U | Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 16 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | — | 6 MB |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-U (2025) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 17,397 | 17,466 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 235U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235U | Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core Ultra 5 235U) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Core Ultra 5 235U requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235U | Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 740M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











