
Core Ultra 5 225T
Popular choices:

Xeon 6353P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 225T
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics (16EU), while Xeon 6353P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,874 vs 26,910).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6353P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $240 MSRP, while Xeon 6353P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon 6353P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 225T
2025Xeon 6353P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics (16EU), while Xeon 6353P needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,874 vs 26,910).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6353P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $240 MSRP, while Xeon 6353P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225T better than Xeon 6353P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225T | Xeon 6353P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225T | Xeon 6353P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 612 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 438 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 340 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225T | Xeon 6353P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 672 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 522 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 504 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 285 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225T | Xeon 6353P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 672 FPS | 673 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 672 FPS | 652 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 672 FPS | 673 FPS |
| high | 611 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 535 FPS | 535 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 382 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225T and Xeon 6353P

Core Ultra 5 225T
Core Ultra 5 225T
The Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,874 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon 6353P
Xeon 6353P
The Xeon 6353P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 26,910 points. Launch price was $426.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225T packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Xeon 6353P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225T versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6353P — a 4% clock advantage for the Xeon 6353P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon 6353P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225T scores 26,874 against the Xeon 6353P's 26,910 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon 6353P. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225T vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6353P.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | Xeon 6353P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+50% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 26,874 | 26,910 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,677 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,943 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6353P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | Xeon 6353P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225T) / not specified (Xeon 6353P). The Core Ultra 5 225T includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics (16EU)), while the Xeon 6353P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225T rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | Xeon 6353P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics (16EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













