
Core Ultra 5 225T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 225T
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics (16EU), while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $240 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,864 vs 26,874).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 225T
2025Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics (16EU), while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $240 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,864 vs 26,874).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225T better than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 410 FPS |
| medium | 438 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 202 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 672 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 522 FPS | 594 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 504 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 345 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 672 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 672 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 672 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 611 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 535 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225T and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

Core Ultra 5 225T
Core Ultra 5 225T
The Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,874 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,864 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225T packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225T versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS — a 4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225T scores 26,874 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS's 26,864 — a 0% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 26,874 | 26,864 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,677 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,943 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225T) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS). The Core Ultra 5 225T includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics (16EU)), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225T rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics (16EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












