Core Ultra 5 225T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

Intel

Core Ultra 5 225T

10 Cores10 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 225T

2025

Why buy it

  • +0% higher PassMark.
  • +25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics (16EU), while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $240 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (26,864 vs 26,874).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 225T better than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 225T pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark. Core Ultra 5 225T also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 225T is the better fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 10 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 225T is the smarter buy today. Core Ultra 5 225T is at an unclear MSRP at $240 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 225T is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 10 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 225TRyzen 7 PRO 8840HS
1080p
low253 FPS255 FPS
medium244 FPS235 FPS
high206 FPS198 FPS
ultra175 FPS170 FPS
1440p
low217 FPS227 FPS
medium186 FPS189 FPS
high153 FPS154 FPS
ultra132 FPS136 FPS
4K
low148 FPS157 FPS
medium126 FPS133 FPS
high98 FPS103 FPS
ultra86 FPS91 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 225TRyzen 7 PRO 8840HS
1080p
low595 FPS469 FPS
medium508 FPS388 FPS
high420 FPS336 FPS
ultra377 FPS301 FPS
1440p
low498 FPS410 FPS
medium438 FPS358 FPS
high370 FPS310 FPS
ultra317 FPS265 FPS
4K
low299 FPS270 FPS
medium264 FPS247 FPS
high246 FPS234 FPS
ultra217 FPS202 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 5 225TRyzen 7 PRO 8840HS
1080p
low672 FPS672 FPS
medium672 FPS672 FPS
high609 FPS672 FPS
ultra522 FPS594 FPS
1440p
low672 FPS672 FPS
medium588 FPS622 FPS
high515 FPS525 FPS
ultra439 FPS451 FPS
4K
low504 FPS521 FPS
medium422 FPS458 FPS
high377 FPS406 FPS
ultra318 FPS345 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 5 225TRyzen 7 PRO 8840HS
1080p
low672 FPS672 FPS
medium672 FPS672 FPS
high672 FPS672 FPS
ultra672 FPS672 FPS
1440p
low672 FPS672 FPS
medium672 FPS672 FPS
high611 FPS633 FPS
ultra535 FPS548 FPS
4K
low550 FPS559 FPS
medium501 FPS501 FPS
high448 FPS446 FPS
ultra393 FPS384 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225T and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

Intel

Core Ultra 5 225T

The Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,874 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,864 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 225T packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225T versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS — a 4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225T scores 26,874 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS's 26,864 — a 0% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225TRyzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Cores / Threads
10 / 10+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz
5.1 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+25%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)+200%
1 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-25%
4 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
26,874
26,864
Geekbench 6 Single
2,677
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,943
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225TRyzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Socket
LGA1851
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225T) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS). The Core Ultra 5 225T includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics (16EU)), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225T rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225TRyzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc Graphics (16EU)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget