
Core Ultra 5 225T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 225T
2025Why buy it
- ✅+19.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($240 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 64.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics (16EU), while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 26,874).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 112.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225T moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 225T
2025Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+19.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($240 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 64.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics (16EU), while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 26,874).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 112.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225T moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225T better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 438 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 672 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 522 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 504 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 672 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 672 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 672 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 611 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 535 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225T and Ryzen 7 3700X

Core Ultra 5 225T
Core Ultra 5 225T
The Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,874 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225T packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225T versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225T scores 26,874 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 18% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225T vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+11% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+44% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 32 MB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 26,874+20% | 22,430 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,677 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,943 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Core Ultra 5 225T supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 225T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225T) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225T) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Core Ultra 5 225T includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics (16EU)), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225T rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics (16EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 5 225T launched at $240 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($240 vs $329), the Core Ultra 5 225T is $89 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 225T delivers 112.0 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Core Ultra 5 225T the 48.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $240-27% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.0+64% | 68.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












