
Core Ultra 5 135H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 135H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,116 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 135H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 5 135H
2023Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,116 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 135H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Core Ultra 5 135H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 647 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 337 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 255 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 832 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 407 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 974 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 974 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 934 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 826 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 959 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 843 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 694 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen 9 5900X

Core Ultra 5 135H
Core Ultra 5 135H
The Core Ultra 5 135H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,116 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 135H packs 14 cores / 18 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135H versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 135H scores 22,116 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 55.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135H vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 18+17% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 64 MB+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 22,116 | 38,955+76% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core Ultra 5 135H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











