Core Ultra 5 135H vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Intel

Core Ultra 5 135H

14 Cores18 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

6 Cores12 Thrd6 WWMax: 5 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 135H

2023

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (22,116 vs 22,132).

    Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

    2023

    Why buy it

      Trade-offs

      • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

      Quick Answers

      So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS better than Core Ultra 5 135H?
      Yes. Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
      Which one is better for gaming?
      If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
      Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
      For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
      Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
      Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
      Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
      Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

      Games Benchmarks

      Paired with RTX 4090

      To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

      Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

      Path of Exile 2

      Path of Exile 2

      PresetCore Ultra 5 135HRyzen 5 PRO 7640HS
      1080p
      low193 FPS269 FPS
      medium154 FPS242 FPS
      high126 FPS203 FPS
      ultra102 FPS175 FPS
      1440p
      low156 FPS236 FPS
      medium122 FPS193 FPS
      high98 FPS157 FPS
      ultra81 FPS138 FPS
      4K
      low86 FPS164 FPS
      medium73 FPS136 FPS
      high59 FPS105 FPS
      ultra45 FPS92 FPS
      Counter-Strike 2

      Counter-Strike 2

      PresetCore Ultra 5 135HRyzen 5 PRO 7640HS
      1080p
      low553 FPS447 FPS
      medium521 FPS371 FPS
      high422 FPS326 FPS
      ultra378 FPS287 FPS
      1440p
      low549 FPS388 FPS
      medium457 FPS336 FPS
      high379 FPS297 FPS
      ultra324 FPS254 FPS
      4K
      low337 FPS279 FPS
      medium283 FPS247 FPS
      high258 FPS231 FPS
      ultra226 FPS194 FPS
      League of Legends

      League of Legends

      PresetCore Ultra 5 135HRyzen 5 PRO 7640HS
      1080p
      low553 FPS553 FPS
      medium553 FPS553 FPS
      high553 FPS553 FPS
      ultra553 FPS537 FPS
      1440p
      low553 FPS553 FPS
      medium553 FPS553 FPS
      high553 FPS517 FPS
      ultra494 FPS445 FPS
      4K
      low548 FPS502 FPS
      medium441 FPS444 FPS
      high400 FPS378 FPS
      ultra321 FPS312 FPS
      Valorant

      Valorant

      PresetCore Ultra 5 135HRyzen 5 PRO 7640HS
      1080p
      low553 FPS553 FPS
      medium553 FPS553 FPS
      high553 FPS553 FPS
      ultra553 FPS553 FPS
      1440p
      low553 FPS553 FPS
      medium553 FPS553 FPS
      high553 FPS553 FPS
      ultra553 FPS547 FPS
      4K
      low553 FPS553 FPS
      medium524 FPS507 FPS
      high473 FPS452 FPS
      ultra413 FPS387 FPS

      Technical Specifications

      Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

      Intel

      Core Ultra 5 135H

      The Core Ultra 5 135H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,116 points. Launch price was $342.

      AMD

      Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

      The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,132 points. Launch price was $299.

      Processing Power

      The Core Ultra 5 135H packs 14 cores / 18 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135H versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 135H scores 22,116 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS's 22,132 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.

      FeatureCore Ultra 5 135HRyzen 5 PRO 7640HS
      Cores / Threads
      14 / 18+133%
      6 / 12
      Boost Clock
      4.6 GHz
      5 GHz+9%
      Base Clock
      3.6 GHz
      4.3 GHz+19%
      L3 Cache
      18 MB (total)+13%
      16 MB
      L2 Cache
      2 MB (per core)
      6 MB+200%
      Process
      7 nm
      4 nm-43%
      Architecture
      Meteor Lake-H (2023)
      Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
      PassMark
      22,116
      22,132
      🧠

      Memory & Platform

      The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

      FeatureCore Ultra 5 135HRyzen 5 PRO 7640HS
      Socket
      FCBGA2049
      FP7/FP8
      PCIe Generation
      PCIe 5.0+25%
      PCIe 4.0