Core Ultra 5 135H vs Ryzen 5 8645HS

Intel

Core Ultra 5 135H

14 Cores18 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 8645HS

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 135H

2023

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (22,116 vs 22,257).
    • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8645HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Ryzen 5 8645HS

    2023

    Why buy it

    • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
    • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Core Ultra 5 135H needs a discrete GPU.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen 5 8645HS better than Core Ultra 5 135H?
    Yes. Ryzen 5 8645HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 8645HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 8645HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen 5 8645HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 5 8645HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen 5 8645HS is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore Ultra 5 135HRyzen 5 8645HS
    1080p
    low193 FPS265 FPS
    medium154 FPS239 FPS
    high126 FPS200 FPS
    ultra102 FPS172 FPS
    1440p
    low156 FPS234 FPS
    medium122 FPS191 FPS
    high98 FPS156 FPS
    ultra81 FPS138 FPS
    4K
    low86 FPS162 FPS
    medium73 FPS135 FPS
    high59 FPS104 FPS
    ultra45 FPS91 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore Ultra 5 135HRyzen 5 8645HS
    1080p
    low553 FPS426 FPS
    medium521 FPS353 FPS
    high422 FPS308 FPS
    ultra378 FPS271 FPS
    1440p
    low549 FPS369 FPS
    medium457 FPS320 FPS
    high379 FPS281 FPS
    ultra324 FPS240 FPS
    4K
    low337 FPS265 FPS
    medium283 FPS235 FPS
    high258 FPS218 FPS
    ultra226 FPS183 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore Ultra 5 135HRyzen 5 8645HS
    1080p
    low553 FPS556 FPS
    medium553 FPS556 FPS
    high553 FPS556 FPS
    ultra553 FPS556 FPS
    1440p
    low553 FPS556 FPS
    medium553 FPS556 FPS
    high553 FPS520 FPS
    ultra494 FPS449 FPS
    4K
    low548 FPS501 FPS
    medium441 FPS445 FPS
    high400 FPS380 FPS
    ultra321 FPS315 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore Ultra 5 135HRyzen 5 8645HS
    1080p
    low553 FPS556 FPS
    medium553 FPS556 FPS
    high553 FPS556 FPS
    ultra553 FPS556 FPS
    1440p
    low553 FPS556 FPS
    medium553 FPS556 FPS
    high553 FPS556 FPS
    ultra553 FPS545 FPS
    4K
    low553 FPS556 FPS
    medium524 FPS506 FPS
    high473 FPS450 FPS
    ultra413 FPS386 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen 5 8645HS

    Intel

    Core Ultra 5 135H

    The Core Ultra 5 135H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,116 points. Launch price was $342.

    AMD

    Ryzen 5 8645HS

    The Ryzen 5 8645HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,257 points. Launch price was $299.

    Processing Power

    The Core Ultra 5 135H packs 14 cores / 18 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8645HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135H versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8645HS — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8645HS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8645HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 135H scores 22,116 against the Ryzen 5 8645HS's 22,257 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 8645HS. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8645HS.

    FeatureCore Ultra 5 135HRyzen 5 8645HS
    Cores / Threads
    14 / 18+133%
    6 / 12
    Boost Clock
    4.6 GHz
    5 GHz+9%
    Base Clock
    3.6 GHz
    4.3 GHz+19%
    L3 Cache
    18 MB (total)+13%
    16 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    2 MB (per core)+100%
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    7 nm
    4 nm-43%
    Architecture
    Meteor Lake-H (2023)
    Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
    PassMark
    22,116
    22,257
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    13,316
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,574
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    10,675
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 8645HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore Ultra 5 135HRyzen 5 8645HS
    Socket
    FCBGA2049
    FP8
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+25%
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    LPDDR5x-7500
    Max RAM Capacity
    256 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    20
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Core Ultra 5 135H) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8645HS). The Ryzen 5 8645HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Core Ultra 5 135H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8645HS targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8645HS rivals Core i5-13500H.

    FeatureCore Ultra 5 135HRyzen 5 8645HS
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Radeon 760M
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Virtualization
    AMD-V (SVM)
    Target Use
    Gaming