
Core Ultra 5 135H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 8645HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 135H
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,116 vs 22,257).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8645HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 8645HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Core Ultra 5 135H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core Ultra 5 135H
2023Ryzen 5 8645HS
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Core Ultra 5 135H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,116 vs 22,257).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8645HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8645HS better than Core Ultra 5 135H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 271 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 337 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 183 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 520 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen 5 8645HS

Core Ultra 5 135H
Core Ultra 5 135H
The Core Ultra 5 135H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,116 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 5 8645HS
Ryzen 5 8645HS
The Ryzen 5 8645HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,257 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 135H packs 14 cores / 18 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8645HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135H versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8645HS — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8645HS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8645HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 135H scores 22,116 against the Ryzen 5 8645HS's 22,257 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 8645HS. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8645HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 18+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 22,116 | 22,257 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,316 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,574 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,675 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 8645HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core Ultra 5 135H) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8645HS). The Ryzen 5 8645HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Core Ultra 5 135H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8645HS targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8645HS rivals Core i5-13500H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 760M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











