
Core Ultra 5 135H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 135H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,116 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 135H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 5 135H
2023Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,116 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 135H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Core Ultra 5 135H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 337 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 245 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 665 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 607 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 533 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen 7 5700X

Core Ultra 5 135H
Core Ultra 5 135H
The Core Ultra 5 135H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,116 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 135H packs 14 cores / 18 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135H versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 135H scores 22,116 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 18.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 18+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+6% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 22,116 | 26,609+20% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core Ultra 5 135H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











