
Core Ultra 5 135H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 135H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 5 7400
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 135H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,010 vs 22,116).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core Ultra 5 135H
2023Ryzen 5 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 135H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,010 vs 22,116).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 135H better than Ryzen 5 7400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 296 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 337 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 531 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 239 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 533 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen 5 7400

Core Ultra 5 135H
Core Ultra 5 135H
The Core Ultra 5 135H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,116 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 5 7400
Ryzen 5 7400
The Ryzen 5 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,010 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 135H packs 14 cores / 18 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7400 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135H versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7400 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 135H (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7400 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 135H scores 22,116 against the Ryzen 5 7400's 22,010 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 5 135H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7400.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 18+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+7% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,116 | 22,010 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7400 uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











