
Core Ultra 5 135H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 135H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Core Ultra 5 135H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 135H across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 22,116).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 135H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 5 135H
2023Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Core Ultra 5 135H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 135H across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 22,116).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 135H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 135H better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 337 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 197 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen 5 5600

Core Ultra 5 135H
Core Ultra 5 135H
The Core Ultra 5 135H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,116 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 135H packs 14 cores / 18 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135H versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 135H (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 135H scores 22,116 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 2.6% lead for the Core Ultra 5 135H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 18+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+5% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,116+3% | 21,550 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 11,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,052 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core Ultra 5 135H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135H | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











