Athlon 64 3600+ vs Opteron 250

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

Passmark Score

595

Passmark Score

620

Performance Difference

Opteron 250 is 4.2% faster than Athlon 64 3600+

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this CPU comparison, Opteron 250 performs 4.2% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Athlon 64 3600+ and Opteron 250.

Both processors are popular choices for gaming PCs. Consider factors like core count, boost clock speeds, power consumption (TDP), and gaming vs productivity performance when choosing between these CPUs.

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Athlon 64 3600+ and Opteron 250

AMD

Athlon 64 3600+

The Athlon 64 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Junho 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 595 points.

General Information

Type:desktop
Designer:AMD
Release Date:Junho 2004 (21 years ago)
Architecture Codename:Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Performance Ranking Position:3316

Technical Specifications

Cores:1
Threads:1
Die Size:193 mm2
L1 Cache:128K
L2 Cache:1 MB
Max Frequency:2.4 GHz
64-Bit Support:+
Transistor Count:106 million
Process Technology:130 nm
Max Case Temperature (TCase):70 °C
Compatibilidade Com Windows 11:-

Compatibility

Socket:754
Power Consumption (TDP):89 Watt
Max Processors In Config:1

Memory

RAM Types:DDR1
AMD

Opteron 250

The Opteron 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 620 points. Launch price was $12.

General Information

Type:server
Designer:AMD
Launch Price:$12
Release Date:Dezembro 2004 (21 years ago)
Architecture Codename:SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Performance Ranking Position:3281

Technical Specifications

Cores:1
Threads:1
Die Size:193 mm2
L1 Cache:128 kB
L2 Cache:1 MB
L3 Cache:0 kB
Max Frequency:2.4 GHz
64-Bit Support:+
Transistor Count:106 million
Process Technology:130 nm
Compatibilidade Com Windows 11:-

Compatibility

Socket:940
Power Consumption (TDP):89 Watt
Max Processors In Config:2

Memory

Top Performing CPUs

The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 3600+ and Opteron 250