Xeon X5680
Intel
PassMark
6,910
Performance
Budget
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Overview
The Xeon X5680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,910 points. Launch price was $172.
Specifications
General
- Type
- server
- Designer
- Intel
- Launch price
- $172
- Manufacturer
- Intel
- Release date
- 14 February 2010 (15 years ago)
- Architecture codename
- Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
- Performance ranking position
- 1598
Technical
- Cores
- 6
- Threads
- 12
- Die size
- 239 mm2
- L1 cache
- 64 kB (per core)
- L2 cache
- 256 kB (per core)
- L3 cache
- 12 MB (total)
- Max frequency
- 3.6 GHz
- 64-bit support
- +
- Base frequency
- 3.33 GHz
- Transistor count
- 1,170 million
- Process technology
- 32 nm
- Max core temperature
- 79 °C
- Compatibilidade com Windows 11
- -
Compatibility
- Socket
- LGA1366
- Power consumption (TDP)
- 130 Watt
- Max processors in config
- 2
Memory
- RAM types
- DDR3
- Memory channels
- 3
- Memory bandwidth
- 32 GB/s
- ECC memory support
- +
- Max memory capacity
- 288 GB
Similar Performance
Processors with benchmark scores closest to the current hardware, grouped by manufacturer.
Intel (12)
AMD (12)
Our Recommendation for Xeon X5680
Suggested pairings based on performance balance
Minimum (Avoid Bottleneck) (12)
Recommended (Balanced) (12)
High-End (Max Performance) (12)
Popular Comparisons
Compare Xeon X5680 with other popular CPUs
Related Comparisons
See how Xeon X5680 compares to CPUs with similar performance
