Tesla C2050 vs Radeon R7 360

NVIDIA

Tesla C2050

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 360

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

3176

G3D Mark Score

3116

Performance Difference

Tesla C2050 is 1.9% faster than Radeon R7 360

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Tesla C2050N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
Radeon R7 3602048 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
9%
low37%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 3,116 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Tesla C2050 performs 1.9% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Tesla C2050 and Radeon R7 360.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Tesla C2050 and Radeon R7 360

NVIDIA

Tesla C2050

The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. Core clock: 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:48
TMUs:56
Vram:null
L1 Cache:896 kB
L2 Cache:768 kB
Core Clock:574 MHz
Shading Units:448
Transistor Count:3,100 million
Texture Fill Rate:32.14
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):238 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.028 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GF100
Architecture:Fermi (2010βˆ’2014)
Release Date:July 25 2011
Performance Ranking Position:569
AMD

Radeon R7 360

The Radeon R7 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. Boost clock: 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,116 points. Launch price was $109.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:48
Vram:2048 MB
L1 Cache:192 kB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Boost Clock:1000 MHz
Shading Units:768
Transistor Count:2,080 million
Texture Fill Rate:50.40
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):100 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.613 TFLOPS

General Information

Design:reference
Codename:Tobago
Architecture:GCN 2.0 (2013βˆ’2017)
Launch Price:$109
Release Date:June 18 2015
Performance Ranking Position:576

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla C2050 and Radeon R7 360