Radeon X1600 XT vs Quadro FX 380M

AMD

Radeon X1600 XT

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

116

G3D Mark Score

121

Performance Difference

Quadro FX 380M is 4.3% faster than Radeon X1600 XT

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Radeon X1600 XT512 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
10%
low10%
medium10%
high10%
ultra10%
1440pLimited
10%
low10%
medium10%
high10%
ultra10%
4KLimited
10%
low10%
medium10%
high10%
ultra10%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

1 GB VRAM Β· 116 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Quadro FX 380M512 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

1 GB VRAM Β· 121 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro FX 380M performs 4.3% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Radeon X1600 XT and Quadro FX 380M.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Radeon X1600 XT and Quadro FX 380M

AMD

Radeon X1600 XT

The Radeon X1600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It includes 80 ray tracing cores. G3D Mark benchmark score: 116 points. Launch price was $999.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:128
TMUs:320
Vram:512 MB
L0 Cache:1.3 MB
L1 Cache:1 MB
L2 Cache:4 MB
L3 Cache:128 MB
Core Clock:1825 MHz
Boost Clock:2250 MHz
Shading Units:5120
Transistor Count:26,800 million
Ray Tracing Cores:80
Texture Fill Rate:720.0
Manufacturing Process:7 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):300 Watt
Floating Point Performance:23.04 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Navi 21
Architecture:RDNA 2.0 (2020βˆ’2025)
Launch Price:$999
Release Date:October 28 2020
Performance Ranking Position:35
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380M

The Quadro FX 380M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:512 MB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Core Clock:610 MHz
Shading Units:240
Transistor Count:1,400 million
Texture Fill Rate:48.80
Manufacturing Process:55 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):189 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.6221 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GT200B
Architecture:Tesla 2.0 (2007βˆ’2013)
Launch Price:$3,499
Release Date:November 11 2008
Performance Ranking Position:815

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1600 XT and Quadro FX 380M