Radeon RX Vega M GL vs Quadro M2000

AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GL

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M2000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

3906

G3D Mark Score

4026

Performance Difference

Quadro M2000 is 3.1% faster than Radeon RX Vega M GL

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Radeon RX Vega M GLN/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
Quadro M20004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
13%
low60%
medium20%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
7%
low30%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 4,026 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro M2000 performs 3.1% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Radeon RX Vega M GL and Quadro M2000.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Radeon RX Vega M GL and Quadro M2000

AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GL

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,906 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:null
L1 Cache:320 kB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
Core Clock:931 MHz
Boost Clock:1011 MHz
Shading Units:1280
Transistor Count:5,000 million
Texture Fill Rate:80.88
Manufacturing Process:14 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):65 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.588 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Polaris 22
Architecture:GCN 4.0 (2016βˆ’2020)
Release Date:February 1 2018
Performance Ranking Position:500
NVIDIA

Quadro M2000

The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:48
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:288 kB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
Core Clock:796 MHz
Boost Clock:1163 MHz
Shading Units:768
Transistor Count:2,940 million
Texture Fill Rate:55.82
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):75 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.786 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM206
Architecture:Maxwell 2.0 (2014βˆ’2019)
Launch Price:$437.75
Release Date:April 8 2016
Performance Ranking Position:491

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX Vega M GL and Quadro M2000