Radeon R9 M280X vs GeForce GT 635

AMD

Radeon R9 M280X

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 635

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

814

G3D Mark Score

810

Performance Difference

Radeon R9 M280X is 0.5% faster than GeForce GT 635

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Radeon R9 M280X4096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
8%
low27%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
5%
low10%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 814 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

GeForce GT 635N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon R9 M280X performs 0.5% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Radeon R9 M280X and GeForce GT 635.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Radeon R9 M280X and GeForce GT 635

AMD

Radeon R9 M280X

The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Boost clock: 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:128
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:512 kB
L2 Cache:768 kB
Boost Clock:1000 MHz
Shading Units:2048
Transistor Count:4,313 million
Texture Fill Rate:128.0
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):250 Watt
Floating Point Performance:4.096 TFLOPS

General Information

Design:reference
Codename:Tahiti
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$299
Release Date:October 8 2013
Performance Ranking Position:404
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 635

The GeForce GT 635 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. Core clock: 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 810 points. Launch price was $279.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:44
Vram:null
L1 Cache:704 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:607 MHz
Shading Units:352
Max Temperature:105 Β°C
Transistor Count:3,100 million
Texture Fill Rate:26.75
Desempenho Compute:30x
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):200 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.8554 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GF100
Architecture:Fermi (2010βˆ’2014)
Launch Price:$279
Release Date:May 31 2010
Performance Ranking Position:618

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M280X and GeForce GT 635