Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R9 A375

AMD

Radeon R7 250

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 A375

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

1051

G3D Mark Score

1024

Performance Difference

Radeon R7 250 is 2.6% faster than Radeon R9 A375

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Radeon R7 2502048 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 1,051 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon R9 A375N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon R7 250 performs 2.6% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Radeon R7 250 and Radeon R9 A375.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Radeon R7 250 and Radeon R9 A375

AMD

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Boost clock: 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:8
TMUs:24
Vram:2048 MB
L1 Cache:96 kB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Boost Clock:1050 MHz
Shading Units:384
Transistor Count:950 million
Texture Fill Rate:25.20
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):75 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.8064 TFLOPS

General Information

Design:reference
Codename:Oland
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$89
Release Date:October 8 2013
Performance Ranking Position:871
AMD

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:40
Vram:null
Core Clock:1015 MHz
Boost Clock:925 MHz
Shading Units:640
Transistor Count:1,500 million
Texture Fill Rate:40.60
Manufacturing Process:28 nm

General Information

Codename:Venus
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Release Date:2015
Performance Ranking Position:877

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 250 and Radeon R9 A375