RADEON X800 PRO vs GeForce Go 7400

AMD

RADEON X800 PRO

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7400

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

65

G3D Mark Score

66

Performance Difference

GeForce Go 7400 is 1.5% faster than RADEON X800 PRO

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

RADEON X800 PRO256 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
8%
low8%
medium8%
high8%
ultra8%
1440pLimited
8%
low8%
medium8%
high8%
ultra8%
4KLimited
8%
low8%
medium8%
high8%
ultra8%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

0 GB VRAM Β· 65 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

GeForce Go 7400256 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

0 GB VRAM Β· 66 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GeForce Go 7400 performs 1.5% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between RADEON X800 PRO and GeForce Go 7400.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for RADEON X800 PRO and GeForce Go 7400

AMD

RADEON X800 PRO

The RADEON X800 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It includes 60 ray tracing cores. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points. Launch price was $579.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:96
TMUs:240
Vram:256 MB
L0 Cache:960 kB
L1 Cache:768 kB
L2 Cache:4 MB
L3 Cache:128 MB
Core Clock:1700 MHz
Boost Clock:2105 MHz
Shading Units:3840
Transistor Count:26,800 million
Ray Tracing Cores:60
Texture Fill Rate:505.2
Manufacturing Process:7 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):250 Watt
Floating Point Performance:16.17 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Navi 21
Architecture:RDNA 2.0 (2020βˆ’2025)
Launch Price:$579
Release Date:October 28 2020
Performance Ranking Position:65
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7400

The GeForce Go 7400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points. Launch price was $89.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:256 MB
L1 Cache:32 kB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Core Clock:993 MHz
Shading Units:384
Transistor Count:1,270 million
Texture Fill Rate:31.78
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):64 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.7626 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK107
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$89
Release Date:May 29 2014
Performance Ranking Position:777

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X800 PRO and GeForce Go 7400